Philips 225B1C

Philips 225B1C

1 expert reviews - 0 user reviews

8.0/10
11

Follow

0

0

Want it

0

Have it

0

Had it

0

We have collected 1 reviews of the Philips 225B1C. Experts rate Philips 225B1C 8/10. Reviewsor.com helps you find reviews, best prices, user reviews of the Philips 225B1C and Philips LCD monitors.

  • Writh a review
  • Say something
  • Ask a question
  • Get support

Rate this product on a score of 10 :

Ecrire une discussion

Got a problem ? Want to share an information ? Which product to choose ?

Title (required)

Describe your message (required)

Tag : - General : - Help : - Good plan : - Tip : - Guide : - Question :

Ecrire une question

Have a question about Philips 225B1C ?

Title of your question (required)

Describe your question (required)

Get support

You have a problem with Philips 225B1C ?

Title (required)

What problem are you having ? (required)

Philips 225B1C Reviews

DigitalVersus

09/2009

Read more...

8.0/10

Product Survey: 22'' LCD Monitors

The 225B1C sits on a height-adjustable stand that rotates from side to side and has built-in speakers, a headphone jack and a USB port to make it easy to connect peripherals to your computer. You have the choice between using DVI and VGA as your video input. It's not often that we see such flexible monitors. The only hitch is that, as is often the case, this is a monitor that uses a TN panel with a 5 ms response time, which reserves it mostly for office use. Sometimes, 5 ms monitors provide a pleasant surprise and are actually pretty fast, but that isn't the case with 2251BC. There aren't any specific concerns, but it's just not responsive enough to fluidly render movements. On the other hand, it's perfectly adapted to office use, as well as some games like strategy or sports titles. For other types of games, which involve fast movements, you'd do better to consider faster screens like the Samsung SyncMaster 2253rz. On average, the input lag is under two frames. That means it won't have any impact on your multi-player gaming. The raw scores measured using our equipment seem relatively close to what we'd expect.