Sony SVT13114GXX

Sony SVT13114GXX

1 expert reviews - 0 user reviews

7.0/10
11

Follow

0

0

Want it

0

Have it

0

Had it

0

We have collected 1 reviews of the Sony SVT13114GXX. Experts rate Sony SVT13114GXX 7/10. Reviewsor.com helps you find reviews, best prices, user reviews of the Sony SVT13114GXX and Sony Ultrabook.

  • Writh a review
  • Say something
  • Ask a question
  • Get support

Rate this product on a score of 10 :

Ecrire une discussion

Got a problem ? Want to share an information ? Which product to choose ?

Title (required)

Describe your message (required)

Tag : - General : - Help : - Good plan : - Tip : - Guide : - Question :

Ecrire une question

Have a question about Sony SVT13114GXX ?

Title of your question (required)

Describe your question (required)

Get support

You have a problem with Sony SVT13114GXX ?

Title (required)

What problem are you having ? (required)

Sony SVT13114GXX Reviews

PCWorld

08/2012

Read more...

7.0/10

Sony SVT13114GXX

It's interesting that Sony describes the VAIO SVT13114GXS as an Ultrabook that's designed to contain "all the connectivity ports that other Ultrabook laptops may lack," when it contains only two USB ports--both located right next to each other. Sure, it might have VGA- and HDMI-out ports, too, but that doesn't make up for the system's myriad issues. This business-oriented Ultrabook is pretty and light, but if you're thinking about purchasing it, you really need to know what your priorities are. It has below-average general performance, a dim screen, and a clean-but-quiet headphone jack, but it also has an excellent keyboard and trackpad. So what's really important to you? Our review model, which costs $849 as configured, has a third-generation Ivy Bridge Intel Core i5-3317U processor, 4GB of RAM, and a 500GB hard drive with a 32GB SSD as a hard drive cache. This VAIO Ultrabook also sports a 13.3-inch screen, 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth 4.0, and runs a 64-bit version of Windows 7 Professional. The VAIO SVT13114GXS (Sony really needs to work on its model names) performs a little below average for its class.